THIS HAS BEEN POSTED B4. JESUS CHRIST YOU BROKE IT.
Spoiler:
Page 10 - 6th Post (That's correct, I posted it bitch)
Achilles.42 Commander
Subject: Re: Funny stuff Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:27 pm
Yeah, but note how no one cared when you posted it.
Spoiler:
I didn't even know we had someone named "amazing" on the forum
AmAzIn[G] Commander
Subject: Re: Funny stuff Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:31 pm
Achilles.42 wrote:
Yeah, but note how no one cared when you posted it.
Spoiler:
I didn't even know we had someone named "amazing" on the forum
Hey Achilles, didn't miss you either. You should not try to vilify me, it only makes you come off as insecure.
Fun Fact: The ancient Egyptian pharaoh Djoser held the Djoser Heb-Sed festival as a series of athletic and ritual events confirming the right of a pharaoh to rule. The emphasis on fitness and right to rule indicated fundamental insecurity that later on (Old Kingdom) pharaohs would not share. I'll make it simple. When one tries to assert an intellectual dominance over another individual they are no different from the insecure pharaohs of the early Old Kingdom.
Spoiler:
Maybe I'm reading too much into this, but it seems as if you were trying to get me to fall for your master plan. 1. Insult Amaz 2. Amaz says something stupid 3. Amaz is trapped, intellectual dominance is secure, crush him with the final blow 4. Intellectual dominance obtained
But hey, I could be wrong
and I'm not exactly sure if vilify works there or not. (I'm leaning towards it doesn't because it means to speak ill of; defame; slander. Achilles was simply trying to make me feel unimportant in a slanderous way, by being mean/rude. So in other words, use your fucking imagination, I am trying to sound intelligent.)
Achilles.42 Commander
Subject: Re: Funny stuff Tue Oct 18, 2011 4:18 pm
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
it seems as if you were trying to get me to fall for your master plan...
My master plan was more like this: 1) say whatever comes to mind 2) enjoy whatever follows, i.e. laugh when amaz writes 200+ words to a 10 word quip because he has such a deepset need to prove everyone else is insecure, not himself.
Spoiler:
Artists... tsk, tsk
Pat1487 Moderator
Subject: Re: Funny stuff Tue Oct 18, 2011 6:26 pm
Amaz, do you have a word of the day calendar that has todays word as "vilify" Because thats the only reason i can come up with for why you would you use a word that you openly admit to not even knowing if it fits where you used it
Not only that, but by writing that part you fell into the master plan that you came up with for him, just that it ended up going 1. Insult amaz 2. Amaz makes himself look stupid 3. Amaz is trapped, intellectual dominance is secure, crush him with the final blow 4. Intellectual dominance obtained
Step 2 seemed unavoidable for you Not because anything you could say is stupid, but because you would overcompensate and use words that you were unsure of, thereby leaving the option to insult you for using words that you dont even know the definition of, which you then tried to cover up and make irrelevant by admitting you were unsure of it Saying the fact was over-overcompensation
If you had said nothing i wouldve deleted his insult since it doesnt qualify to be in funny stuff, but now that you turned it into this its hilarious
Spoiler:
The part that makes me laugh the most is the irony in stating a fact about asserting intellectual dominance showing insecurity when the only reason you would state a fact like that would be in an attempt to assert intellectual dominance
Also you used vilify perfectly fine, its a bit odd to use it here, but it works If only you were more confident in your word choices
AmAzIn[G] Commander
Subject: Re: Funny stuff Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:52 pm
Pat1487 wrote:
Amaz, do you have a word of the day calendar that has todays word as "vilify" Because thats the only reason i can come up with for why you would you use a word that you openly admit to not even knowing if it fits where you used it
Not only that, but by writing that part you fell into the master plan that you came up with for him, just that it ended up going 1. Insult amaz 2. Amaz makes himself look stupid 3. Amaz is trapped, intellectual dominance is secure, crush him with the final blow 4. Intellectual dominance obtained
Step 2 seemed unavoidable for you Not because anything you could say is stupid, but because you would overcompensate and use words that you were unsure of, thereby leaving the option to insult you for using words that you dont even know the definition of, which you then tried to cover up and make irrelevant by admitting you were unsure of it Saying the fact was over-overcompensation
If you had said nothing i wouldve deleted his insult since it doesnt qualify to be in funny stuff, but now that you turned it into this its hilarious
Spoiler:
The part that makes me laugh the most is the irony in stating a fact about asserting intellectual dominance showing insecurity when the only reason you would state a fact like that would be in an attempt to assert intellectual dominance
Also you used vilify perfectly fine, its a bit odd to use it here, but it works If only you were more confident in your word choices
Hahahahahaha How fast did you come to this conclusion? and I know how to use the word vilify, I rewrote this thing like 10 times to get it right lol
Pat1487 Moderator
Subject: Re: Funny stuff Tue Oct 18, 2011 11:18 pm
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
How fast did you come to this conclusion?
Putting it into those words took awhile, but not too long, i came to those conclusions right away though I normally dont respond in this topic, but when i saw that irony i couldnt help it
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
I know how to use the word vilify, I rewrote this thing like 10 times to get it right lol
Even after 10 rewrites you still werent sure if you used it right, otherwise you wouldve gotten rid of that part So dont try to pretend like you knew all along now
Quote :
1. Insult amaz 2. Amaz makes himself look stupid 3. Amaz is trapped, intellectual dominance is secure, crush him with the final blow 4. Intellectual dominance obtained
When i rewrote the plan you came up with for ach, it was supposed to be this: 1. Insult amaz 2. Amaz makes himself look stupid 3. Amaz is trapped, intellectual dominance is secure, crush him with the final blow 4. Troll amaz
I copied and pasted the original thing you wrote, changed step 2, but forgot to change step 4
AmAzIn[G] Commander
Subject: Re: Funny stuff Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:15 am
Pat1487 wrote:
Step 2 seemed unavoidable for you Not because anything you could say is stupid, but because you would overcompensate and use words that you were unsure of, thereby leaving the option to insult you for using words that you dont even know the definition of, which you then tried to cover up and make irrelevant by admitting you were unsure of it Saying the fact was over-overcompensation
This is all pointless anyways. I used the word correctly, and questioned my use at the end in a spoiler - yes I wasn't 100% sure I used the word correctly - are you ever 100% sure of anything? lol.
How the hell can you say I do not know the definition of the word vilify. I had to know the definition in order to use it correctly. Admitting I was unsure of how I used the word - I was questioning my use - instead of keeping it inside my head I just typed it out. There is really no argument for that because the word was used correctly lol... There is only ignorance in people who do not question.
So maybe I wasn't 100% sure that I used vilify correctly, but I did and that's that lol.
and finally I love hipster irony. lol
Pat1487 Moderator
Subject: Re: Funny stuff Wed Oct 19, 2011 11:47 am
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
This is all pointless anyways. I used the word correctly, and questioned my use at the end in a spoiler - yes I wasn't 100% sure I used the word correctly - are you ever 100% sure of anything? lol.
Yes But even when im not, im still sure enough to be confident in w/e i decide by the time i make a decision And its not really a problem when choosing words
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
How the hell can you say I do not know the definition of the word vilify.
I wasnt I was saying the way you reacted was to use words you were unsure of
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
I had to know the definition in order to use it correctly.
Knowing the definition doesnt always help with the context you use a word in And not knowing the definition doesnt always mean you cant get the right context It doesnt matter if you knew or not, you werent sure if you knew
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
Admitting I was unsure of how I used the word - I was questioning my use - instead of keeping it inside my head I just typed it out. There is really no argument for that because the word was used correctly lol...
No one called you out on using it, there was no reason for you to type out that you were unsure The reason you did it was what i said: "leaving the option to insult you for using words that you dont even know the definition of, which you then tried to cover up and make irrelevant by admitting you were unsure of it" You were unsure of it and didnt want to give ach (or anyone) the ability to say something about it
In other words You were insecure about your word choice and felt the need to preemptively defend yourself by deflecting the fact that you were unsure of yourself with a statement about being unsure, thinking that it would be pointless for someone to say "you used it wrong" if it looked like you accepted the possibility that you used it wrong
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
There is only ignorance in people who do not question.
As long as they arent asking stupid questions
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
So maybe I wasn't 100% sure that I used vilify correctly, but I did and that's that lol.
I said you used it right, i never said you didnt, just that you werent sure about it I find it interesting needed to post more about it
Serenity09 Moderator
Subject: Re: Funny stuff Wed Oct 19, 2011 11:53 am
cmon guys, keep it funny
second paragraph-soooo good
AmAzIn[G] Commander
Subject: Re: Funny stuff Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:47 pm
Pat1487 wrote:
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
Admitting I was unsure of how I used the word - I was questioning my use - instead of keeping it inside my head I just typed it out. There is really no argument for that because the word was used correctly lol...
No one called you out on using it, there was no reason for you to type out that you were unsure The reason you did it was what i said: "leaving the option to insult you for using words that you dont even know the definition of, which you then tried to cover up and make irrelevant by admitting you were unsure of it" You were unsure of it and didnt want to give ach (or anyone) the ability to say something about it
In other words You were insecure about your word choice and felt the need to preemptively defend yourself by deflecting the fact that you were unsure of yourself with a statement about being unsure, thinking that it would be pointless for someone to say "you used it wrong" if it looked like you accepted the possibility that you used it wrong
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
Hey Achilles, didn't miss you either. You should not try to vilify me, it only makes you come off as insecure.
Derp. Achilles is as dumb as I am. Fuck you pat. lol.
Spoiler:
I'm more interested into why pat decided to jump into a discussion between two people that had absolutely nothing to do with him. Insert really good reason and deep thought as to why pat is insecure just as much as me and ach [here]. Only because it's true :d
Pat1487 Moderator
Subject: Re: Funny stuff Thu Oct 20, 2011 12:02 am
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
Pat1487 wrote:
In other words You were insecure about your word choice and felt the need to preemptively defend yourself by deflecting the fact that you were unsure of yourself with a statement about being unsure, thinking that it would be pointless for someone to say "you used it wrong" if it looked like you accepted the possibility that you used it wrong
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
Hey Achilles, didn't miss you either. You should not try to vilify me, it only makes you come off as insecure.
I wasnt even talking about the line you quoted of yourself, i was talking about this line:
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
and I'm not exactly sure if vilify works there or not. (I'm leaning towards it doesn't because it means to speak ill of; defame; slander. Achilles was simply trying to make me feel unimportant in a slanderous way, by being mean/rude.
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
Derp. Achilles is as dumb as I am. Fuck you pat. lol.
I dont see how what you said makes ach dumb Im not saying he is or isnt dumb but what you said doesnt make him look either
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
I'm more interested into why pat decided to jump into a discussion between two people that had absolutely nothing to do with him. Insert really good reason and deep thought as to why pat is insecure just as much as me and ach [here]. Only because it's true :d
I didnt jump in because i was insecure Insecure people dont randomly interrupt people when no one is talking to/about them Well, they might, but its not a sign of insecurity Well, i guess it could be a sign of insecurity, if they are insecure about not being the center of attention But that doesnt apply to this situation because this doesnt make me the center of attention
Plus i already told you why i jumped in The irony
AmAzIn[G] wrote:
Insert really good reason and deep thought as to why pat is insecure just as much as me and ach [here]. Only because it's true :d
You cant even come up with something half decent that would at least be entertaining Insert 2 more paragraphs ranting about amaz's inability to have deep thought
I didnt know whether to put this here or not It starts off somewhat funny, but soon turns into something that freaked me out It's not a jump scare or anything About 0:40 is where it starts freaking me out, dont just skip to 0:40 though, the first part is like build up
marksoccer Commander
Subject: Re: Funny stuff Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:23 pm
What the hell did I just watch
Achilles.42 Commander
Subject: Re: Funny stuff Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:18 pm
Edit: It works in the preview, but i cant see it when i actually post it. here's a link for it: magichappytext Edit: Oh, of course now it works now that i post an alternate link. whatever, fuck you internet.